UK may disrupt social networks during unrest (false flag events to help the government regulate the Internet?)

UK may disrupt social networks during unrest (false flag events to help the government regulate the Internet?): "UK may disrupt social networks during unrest

Britain is considering ways to disrupt online social messaging and networks such as Blackberry Messenger and Twitter during civil unrest, a government source said on Thursday.

Police have said social networks were used by rioters to co-ordinate looting during four days of disorder across England this week.

'We know this was used ... the question is can you do something to disrupt that in a way that deals with these problems?' the source said.

'We are having conversations with intelligence services and the industry.'

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We agree with this article. We found thousands of messages that claim to be Anonymous, attributing responsibility for things we would never do and now it happens with the riots. Be alert to this. Do not allow Internet Censorship! An article in PC magazine shows that the corporate media is starting to ask the same question that the alternative media has been asking. Are the recent string of hacker attacks a false flag operations meant to drum up support to push through Internet censorship laws that the public would otherwise protest? Are the recent riots a false flag operations meant to drum up support to push through Internet censorship laws that the public would otherwise protest?

"